For what it’s worth, this is the actual stream from last night. It is possible I will deeply offend, literally, everyone who reads this. Not my intent, but at least it’s equitable. And naturally, this is all just my opinion. So come meander with me.
I heard a clip of Miss South Carolina – therefore…and…such as, the Iraq? – and BabyCats asked what the fuck that was all about, so I fired up YouTube and played her the clip. Down among the comments was something to the effect of, ‘Yeah she’s dumb as a rake handle, but she’s hot so she’ll marry a rich guy, settle down, vote Republican and have a great life,’ and that’s all good. That’s the American dream.
But what I thought was, rich guy doesn’t want to buy a car he can’t drive, so being hot isn’t enough. Rich guy is going to want to bang his trophy wife. So if you choose to go down the trophy wife road, you’re going to fuck a rich guy, and he’s going to buy you shit. Yeah, you might have kids and be a family, and have a nice life, but you wouldn’t have those things, and that life, and that path, if he hadn’t been rich and you hadn’t been hot. And to go one layer deeper, not just rich and hot, respectively, but also willing to participate in a transaction of money for sex. As long as both parties keep it in the back of their minds that money can be lost, quicklike, and looks fade, almost inevitably, and either one of them may wake up one day to realize they have no more assets to leverage during negotiation. Or mediation. Whichever you prefer.
And the thing is, I have absolutely no problem with arrangements like that. You’ve got to run what you brung. If a dame is hot but dumb, and a cat is rich but unappealing, by all means, come together on this. That is, as I understand it, how these things often worked before Falling In Love™ and being in a relationship became something we do for entertainment. We’ll circle back to that.
I think prostitution should be completely legal at every level. I truly believe that keeping prostitution illegal is denying hot, dumb, shady dames the right to use their talents for monetary gain. I’m not being funny. That’s not a gag. I think it’s not fair that a chick who has a skill set that could make her $5K a weekend can’t capitalize on it. And it’s significantly more offensive to me if that’s her only skill set. On the other side, it’s totally fucked up that a rich guy – or woman, if we’re being fair – can’t pay hot tail to have sleepovers. It hurts no one. It affects no one. It’s private, and it’s capitalism, so naturally, the party of capitalism and small government and deregulation is passionately opposed to it.
I’ll paraphrase Hunter S. Thompson – badly – in one of his letters. He said he’d do something other than write, if he could. It was all he knew how to do. It was the only thing he could do. That was the paraphrasing, by the way. This next part is me again.
No one asks a coal miner why he doesn’t do something else for a living.
Me: You should do something else for a living.
Coal Miner: This is all I know how to do, and it is something I’m good at, and it’s the best money I can make in this state, and my family has done it for a hundred years.
Me: Well, you could move your family to another state and work part time jobs while you go to college, and hope you’re suited to it and able to maintain a decent GPA, and after you graduate – if you graduate – you could hope to get into an internship or something, and then get hired, and maybe in ten or twelve years you’d be all set.
Coal Miner: You buying?
Me: Nope.
Coal Miner: Then get the fuck out of my face.
No one asks people with back breaking jobs why they don’t do something else. That question is reserved for people with gigs that appear to be ‘fun’ or economically irrelevant. Crack dealer, writer, artist, hooker. Why don’t I do something else? Man, I can’t do anything else. This is it. And it’s not hurting anyone. This is what I can do, and what I’m good at. This is my aptitude.
And from there the stream led to other inequities in the application of skills. How and why people end up where they end up, doing what they do. What people are willing to do to get what they want.
Someone told me once that all it takes to be rich is wanting to be rich. If you want to be rich, you’ll be rich. I disagreed. I said, ‘Shit, everyone wants to be rich. Not many people are. Your theory is flawed.’
She told me most people that think they want to be rich don’t want to be rich. What they want is to be players, and ballers, and the landed gentry, and more successful than their neighbors, and more successful than the guy their high school girlfriend ended up marrying. They want to get married and have kids and have a fun life and take vacations. They want consumer electronics and Escalades, and in-ground pools, and the kids in private school. They want to be happy. They want everything that money buys, but not money itself. They do not, in fact, want to be rich.
People who want to be rich, all they care about is that pile. They drive old Buicks and live on beans and rice. They work 16 hour days. They shop at thrift stores and live in tax auction houses and send their kids to public school in hand me downs, if they bothered to have kids at all. Cause how do kids make that pile bigger? If it doesn’t make the pile grow, it has no relevance to them. They don’t look rich, and that’s how they get rich. It is its own occupation, separate from whatever their revenue stream is, and it is all consuming, and to do it properly you need to be a little amoral and a lot ruthless, and very, very few people are those things, or if they are, are willing to come to terms with it. You need to be willing to redistribute wealth, from the poor and desperate and stupid and vulnerable, to the you. That’s why so few people make the move from middle class to wealth.
Instead, people go into debt to show how wealthy they are. And the middle class keeps itself poor by spending like they’re rich.
There is disagreement on this. I have repeated her theory to people over the years, as I just did here, and there is pushback. I am told that The Elite keep the middle and lower class down by lobbying for shittier and shittier schools, deregulation of banks and lenders, deregulation of industry, pollution control, and unions, and all the rest.
And this is where the stream ties up a little bit.
Yeah, maybe rich people do that. Maybe they work to keep people down. Maybe they do that and so the fuck what?
The common complaint from the left and the right is that the other party convinces its members to vote against their own self interest. OK, here we have a group of people actively voting in their own self interest. Isn’t that what we’re all supposed to do?
Hot, shallow chick has to work her way up, but in the right town, with the right agent, she can make $200K a year as an escort. To a lot of people, that’s just not fair. But in a way, it’s the most fair thing of all. That’s what she can do, and she’s found a way to do it. Well, hedge fund manager has found his little niche too. He’s a ruthless prick what can network, and he does, and he acts in his own self interest and stays rich. He does what we’re all told we should be doing.
Morality is a condition of surplus. We only worry about morals because we can. Morals are entirely conditional, and therefore, totally fake. If you had to stab someone’s eyes out to save your kid’s lives, you’d do it without hesitation. You’d turn into an animal in a nano-second. Visualize it. Embrace this uncomfortable thought. Accept it.
Hooker and hedge fund manager have transcended phony morality and act in their own self interest. Good for them. We should all do the same. Many people tell us to do the same, they just gloss over the ultimate destination of a ride like that.
To come at it from another angle, if any of us had sudden access to the type of political influence a fuck-zillionaire has, how many of us wouldn’t immediately inflict our personal vision of utopia onto the rest of America?
And that got me thinking about Michael Moore. Cause see, those founding fathers weren’t that hot on democracy. It wasn’t important to them. They wanted a constitutional republic with limited democracy. I recently saw Alexander Hamilton referred to as a treasonous bastard for pushing Federalism. Shit man, they wanted to make George Washington king. But I was taught they didn’t want a king. Ah, I see, they just didn’t want that king. Much clearer now. Either way, they wanted freedom, not democracy. The democracy fetish cult came later, and it was a back-door for people to get their candidate who couldn’t get elected elected, by allowing people who couldn’t previously vote to vote.
Yes, I am at war with grammar. I’ll choke grammar till it pees its pants.
So Michael Moore has, I think, made his position on redistribution of wealth clear, and if he, or one of his rabid union fans, if one of them suddenly had access to, say, the presidency, what would happen?
Don’t worry. I’ll beat up conservatives too.
If Michael Moore, as an example, thought he could be governor of Michigan, he would run and he would make Michigan, I believe, the most pro-union, socially just state in America. He’d make California look like Kentucky.
Pat Robertson would do the same thing. And in six months women would all be wearing floor length wool skirts and submitting to pre-wedding virginity exams, and all the ‘mos would have been rounded up and gassed.
Cause see, no one likes a dictator but everyone knows they’d make a good one. A fair one.
Kaddahfi (sp?) has a shit ton of fans. No, but he does. He’s a ruthless dictator what represses with the repression, and, what, 30% of Libyans think he’s doing a damn fine job. So if Michael Moore or Pat Robertson could fix everything that is wrong with America at the expense of, say, a quarter of the population, wouldn’t they do it? Wouldn’t any of us? That’s a straight up greater good calculation, just like Spock did when he got into the phone booth reactor. Tyranny of the majority? Well correct me if I’m wrong, but can’t a majority vote for a president who will place supreme court justices who will vote in support of an amendment that trumps that pesky part of the constitution? See, we even did it legal like.
Personally, I do think corporations and corporate interests and banks have spent the last 30 years systematically dismantling the American educational system. They’ve corrupted and totally taken over both parties. They’ve deregulated the shit out of every industry in the name of ‘job creation’. They’ve leveraged media – entertainment and journalism – into a propaganda machine generating avarice on one channel and fear on the other, and the solution for both is to buy shit we can’t afford with money borrowed from banks they own. They’ve fostered anti-intellectualism and homo-phobia into a toxic stew that sees any activity not devoted to Jesus or profit as somehow suspect. They’ve taken over, and made us all slaves, and pretty much destroyed America for the 21st century, if not forever. When it collapses they’ll take their money and move to a new place and America can finally stop pretending it isn’t a banana republic.
And I have to say, if it wasn’t them, it would have been someone else. Communists or Evangelicals or some other group. Hyper-capitalist sociopath happened to have just the right skill set to get it done.
The only possible logical argument I’ve heard, the only one that isn’t just jealous and pissy, is that the inequitable distribution of wealth is hurting people, and it therefore doesn’t pass the criteria for being all good. Well, Mr. Moore’s plan would hurt people too. People would lose fortunes their family spent centuries building. But see, every plan hurts people. The ‘doesn’t hurt anyone’ clause can’t be a criteria for the macro, only the personal. We are animals, animals eat other animals. Usually in the most horrible ways. Animals rip each other apart alive. Animals eat animals that are still kicking and screaming. It sucks, but that’s how it works. Life eats life.
It seems so not fair, but if you lean back a bit and do a bong rip or three, you see it’s not just the most fair thing, but the only fair thing.
What you’re saying is these people, this group, should have acted against their own self interest. They should have done the thing you would not have done. And I would not have done.
And from there I started thinking, we care because we believe it matters. We care because we think poor people being poor isn’t fair, or ‘mos not being deported brings God’s wrath, or too many niggers get welfare, or psychopaths can schedule a meeting with the president, and those things just aren’t fair. But feeling that way about those things, each of those opinions, they’re just beliefs, and while our beliefs might seem really, really deep and real to each of us, they aren’t.
Cause see, for every issue you or I feel strongly about, there is an exact opposite opinion. I shit you not. For each of the things I just mentioned, things that we’ve all heard very compelling arguments for, you and I both know and have heard equally compelling arguments against.
For every guy who’s pro-union cause his daddy was a union man, there’s another guy who’s anti-union cause his daddy was a union man, and both of them, each of them, their logic is sound and defensible. Because it’s totally subjective and arbitrary.
A: It’s just a clump of cells. Making abortion illegal would be like saying I can’t have a cyst drained.
B: Cyst doesn’t grow up to be self aware.
A: People shouldn’t starve in the wealthiest nation that has ever existed.
B: No. They should contrive a means to purchase food.
A: Corporations have too much influence on government.
B: Wouldn’t you like the same amount?
A: I’m sick of minorities sucking my tax dollars.
B: They’re Americans citizens utilizing a legal social support structure.
A: God’s judgment is upon us.
B: Which God was that?
A: Lazy Mexican wants to take my job.
B: Which is it? Is he lazy, or after your job?
How each of us feels about these things is totally subjective, and totally arbitrary. There is no right answer, even if each side pretends theirs is the right one, and the only one.
We just pick, like we pick Ford or Chevy, and that’s our brand, and our party, and we’ve got plenty of valid, heartfelt, sincere, defensible, and totally bullshit reasons for picking it.
If values and beliefs are that arbitrary, they are, in fact, not real. They don’t exist. They’re just some shit we say and think and feel, but they aren’t real.
They are electro-chemical reactions in our brains, and five minutes after our heart stops beating that electro-chemical activity will stop and those beliefs will evaporate.
And anything that flimsy isn’t real enough to fight over. Sorry.
All this drama, and fighting, and all the left/right/right/left and god fighting the godless and money fighting the poor and hippies fighting oil companies, yeah all that shit is shit we do cause we don’t have anything better to do. All the media fear mongering and reality shows and video games, and the bar on Friday and Saturday, and falling in love, and arguing, and breaking up and make up sex and hate fucks and cheating and resolution and all that shit. Party activism, and marches and rallies and sit ins and forums and comments and at the end of it we choose between identical corporate sponsored puppets. Sitting square eyed watching old Japanese women pulled from rubble, and the animation of the fallout spilling across the Pacific, and Libyan night vision tracer fire.
This is what we can afford to do. Fuck-zillionaire doesn’t do this shit. He’s got better shit to do. He’s got to make sure this is all we have to do, so we’ll keep doing it, so he’ll be able to stay a fuck-zillionaire.
I say, let him do it.
That girl, the one that told me why people aren’t rich? She told me something else. She told me if you want to know instantly what the most important thing is, to you, look at what you have. Every choice and decision you’ve made since you were 15 was for the specific goal of getting something. Look at what you have, and where you are. What you have is what you wanted. It’s not always apparent, and there are unintended consequences. That’s the part you have to participate in, and be chaotic and vulnerable, and understand you didn’t want to be in jail, but you did want to be respected, so you were a baller, and you got what you wanted, right up to the jail part. Or you’re stuck in a loveless marriage with a cheating husband, because you wanted the security of marrying a rich, shallow man who will trade money for sex, and now he’s trading it to someone else while you sit at home at 40. You got exactly what you wanted, minus the unintended consequences, of course. Those are grim examples. There are plenty of people with exactly what they always wanted, minus the bad stuff, and they’re happy as a pig in shit. But whoever and whatever you are, stop pretending you’re a victim of anyone or anything. We are all where we have put ourselves. If you want to be someone else, or somewhere else, get after it. Just realize the commitment it will require, and if you’re not up to it, don’t bother.
So me, I say we go climbing and act like the animals we all secretly know we are. I say we eat the berries that make us see the colors, and swim naked and let the sun bake us. I say we lean back under the Milky Way so bright we can read by it, and all of a sudden that cute girl we saw at the crag like five hours ago is sitting down next to us at the campfire, and she’s carrying two beers.
I say, fuck it. I have exactly what I’ve always wanted.
</epic>